Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation
Impact in
- Epidemiology 29
Classified as
- Journal
- Statistics in Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/sim.7654 →Countries where authors are citing Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation
This map shows the geographic impact of Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation
This network shows the impact of Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation.
About Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation
This paper, published in 2018, received 288 indexed citations . Written by Michael Schomaker and Christian Heumann covering the research area of Statistics and Probability. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistics and Probability (41 citations), Epidemiology (29 citations), Economics and Econometrics (23 citations), Sociology and Political Science (16 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (14 citations). Published in Statistics in Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/sim.7654.