Practical recommendations for reportingFine‐Gray model analyses for competing risk data

767 indexed citations
published 2017

Impact in

Classified as

Authors
Peter C. AustinJason P. Fine
Journal
Statistics in Medicine

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/sim.7501 →

Countries where authors are citing Practical recommendations for reportingFine‐Gray model analyses for competing risk data

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Practical recommendations for reportingFine‐Gray model analyses for competing risk data. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Practical recommendations for reportingFine‐Gray model analyses for competing risk data with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Practical recommendations for reportingFine‐Gray model analyses for competing risk data more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Practical recommendations for reportingFine‐Gray model analyses for competing risk data

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Practical recommendations for reportingFine‐Gray model analyses for competing risk data. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Practical recommendations for reportingFine‐Gray model analyses for competing risk data.

About Practical recommendations for reportingFine‐Gray model analyses for competing risk data

This paper, published in 2017, received 767 indexed citations . Written by Peter C. Austin and Jason P. Fine covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics and Statistics and Probability. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (77 citations), Surgery (75 citations), Epidemiology (75 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (58 citations) and Oncology (50 citations). Published in Statistics in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/sim.7501.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Microbiological status of root‐filled teeth with apical periodontitisBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited?Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Adaptive non‐local means denoising of MR images with spatially varying noise levelsBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy.Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper How Undergraduates Are Affected by Service Participation.Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional‐Stakeholder PerspectiveBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Treatment of single brain metastasis: Radiotherapy alone or combined with neurosurgeryBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper An Illustrated Consensus on the Classification of Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Intraductal Papillary Mucinous NeoplasmsBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper End-to-End Relation Extraction using LSTMs on Sequences and Tree StructuresBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS)