Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome
Impact in
- Genetics 284
Classified as
- Journal
- Statistics in Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/sim.6522 →Countries where authors are citing Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome
This map shows the geographic impact of Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome
This network shows the impact of Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome.
About Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome
This paper, published in 2015, received 994 indexed citations . Written by Fabiola Del Greco M, Cosetta Minelli, Nuala A. Sheehan and John R. Thompson covering the research area of Genetics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Genetics (284 citations), Molecular Biology (149 citations), Epidemiology (70 citations), Rheumatology (70 citations) and Physiology (64 citations). Published in Statistics in Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/sim.6522.