Estimating average annual per cent change in trend analysis
Impact in
- Oncology 129
- Epidemiology 114
Classified as
- Journal
- Statistics in Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/sim.3733 →Countries where authors are citing Estimating average annual per cent change in trend analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of Estimating average annual per cent change in trend analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Estimating average annual per cent change in trend analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Estimating average annual per cent change in trend analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Estimating average annual per cent change in trend analysis
This network shows the impact of Estimating average annual per cent change in trend analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Estimating average annual per cent change in trend analysis.
About Estimating average annual per cent change in trend analysis
This paper, published in 2009, received 842 indexed citations . Written by Limin X. Clegg, Benjamin F. Hankey, Ram C. Tiwari, Eric J. Feuer and Brenda K. Edwards covering the research area of Oncology and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (129 citations), Epidemiology (114 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (66 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (60 citations) and Surgery (57 citations). Published in Statistics in Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/sim.3733.