Working alliance and outcome effectiveness in videoconferencing psychotherapy: A systematic review and noninferiority meta‐analysis
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2315 →Countries where authors are citing Working alliance and outcome effectiveness in videoconferencing psychotherapy: A systematic review and noninferiority meta‐analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of Working alliance and outcome effectiveness in videoconferencing psychotherapy: A systematic review and noninferiority meta‐analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Working alliance and outcome effectiveness in videoconferencing psychotherapy: A systematic review and noninferiority meta‐analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Working alliance and outcome effectiveness in videoconferencing psychotherapy: A systematic review and noninferiority meta‐analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Working alliance and outcome effectiveness in videoconferencing psychotherapy: A systematic review and noninferiority meta‐analysis
This network shows the impact of Working alliance and outcome effectiveness in videoconferencing psychotherapy: A systematic review and noninferiority meta‐analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Working alliance and outcome effectiveness in videoconferencing psychotherapy: A systematic review and noninferiority meta‐analysis.
About Working alliance and outcome effectiveness in videoconferencing psychotherapy: A systematic review and noninferiority meta‐analysis
This paper, published in 2018, received 227 indexed citations . Written by Nima G Moghaddam, Sam Malins and Rachel Sabin‐Farrell covering the research area of Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (142 citations), Clinical Psychology (99 citations), Applied Psychology (42 citations), Social Psychology (18 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (5 citations). Published in Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2315.