Zina Model

482 citations
21 papers · 298 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Zina Model

20 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers

Zina Model
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 48
  • Rehabilitation 42
  • Surgery 155
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 53
  • Emergency Medical Services 11
Replace Rebecca Mills with:
Rebecca Mills United Kingdom
Colombe Otis Canada
Rodrigo Tomazini Martins Australia
Luíz Lavinsky Brazil
A. Rod France
Damian Ianno Australia
M. Brown United States
Cihan Aslan Türkiye
Cauby Maia Chaves Brazil
Ricardo Silva Pinho Brazil
Zina Model relative to Rebecca Mills United Kingdom Rebecca Mills's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Rebecca Mills · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zina Model

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zina Model's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zina Model with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zina Model more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zina Model

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zina Model. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zina Model. The network helps show where Zina Model may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Zina Model, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zina Model Line = papers co-authored together Zina Model links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201661
2 201544
3 201542
4 201221
5 201520
6 201618
7 201516
8 201615
9 201812
10 201510
11 202110
12 20166
13 20215
14 20234
15 20234
16
Latin America Indicator Research Coalition examines prehospital care using a trauma systems applicationof LCoGS indicator 1.
20173
17 20233
18 20222
19 20231
20 20241

About Zina Model

Zina Model is a scholar working on Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Rehabilitation and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 21 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (9 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (3 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (2 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (2 papers), Global Health and Surgery (1 paper), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (1 paper) and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (48 citations), Rehabilitation (42 citations), Surgery (155 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (53 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (11 citations). Zina Model has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Steve K. Lee, Scott W. Wolfe, Samir K. Trehan, Joseph LeSauter, Rae Silver, Christopher J. Dy, Matthew P. Butler, Carol A. Mancuso, David J. Byun and David R. Weaver. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal Of Hand Surgery, Hand, Hand Clinics, PLoS ONE and Global Health Research and Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact