Zen Rayter

10 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Zen Rayter
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Cancer Research 113
  • Genetics 173
  • Oncology 132
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 78
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 31
Replace Kailas Munot with:
Kailas Munot United Kingdom
Anna Maria Vandone Italy
M. M. de Jong Netherlands
Nawal Kassem United States
Elizabeth A. Schackmann United States
Gabriella Landi Italy
Colette Hyatt United States
Holly Ní Raghallaigh United Kingdom
Seung Sang Ko South Korea
Hari Singhal United States
Zen Rayter relative to Kailas Munot United Kingdom Kailas Munot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.6×
Kailas Munot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zen Rayter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zen Rayter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zen Rayter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zen Rayter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zen Rayter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zen Rayter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zen Rayter. The network helps show where Zen Rayter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Zen Rayter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zen Rayter Line = papers co-authored together Zen Rayter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1
Comparison of the short-term biological effects of 7alpha-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulfinyl)-nonyl]estra-1,3,5, (10)-triene-3,17beta-diol (Faslodex) versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer.
2001199
2 200759
3 200258
4
Evaluation of sialyl Lewis(a), sialyl Lewis(x), and sialyl Tn antigens expression levels as predictors of recurrence after curative surgery in node-negative colorectal cancer patients.
200236
5 200314
6
In-situ carcinoma of the breast.
19903
7 20121
8 20001
9 20111
10 20121

About Zen Rayter

Zen Rayter is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (2 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (2 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers) and Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (113 citations), Genetics (173 citations), Oncology (132 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (78 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (31 citations). Zen Rayter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mitch Dowsett, Elizabeth L. Anderson, Michael James Dixon, Alan Webster, John N Fox, Julia M.W. Gee, Robert I. Nicholson, J.F.R. Robertson, A. E. Wakeling and Charles Q. Morris. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Surgical Oncology, British Journal of Health Psychology, British journal of surgery, Journal of Clinical Oncology and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact