Zachary P. Hohman

980 citations
37 papers · 677 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Zachary P. Hohman

36 papers receiving 650 citations

Peers

Zachary P. Hohman
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Applied Psychology 95
  • Social Psychology 258
  • Sociology and Political Science 341
  • Clinical Psychology 114
  • Communication 39
Replace Cheryl L. Carmichael with:
Cheryl L. Carmichael United States
Alison Blodorn United States
Carmen Valle Spain
Henrik Dobewall Finland
Masaru Kurokawa Japan
Tamara Sims United States
Kaitlin M. Flannery United States
Pamela J. Sawyer United States
Julia L. Briskin United States
Yu Kou China
Zachary P. Hohman relative to Cheryl L. Carmichael United States Cheryl L. Carmichael's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Cheryl L. Carmichael · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zachary P. Hohman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zachary P. Hohman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zachary P. Hohman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zachary P. Hohman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zachary P. Hohman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zachary P. Hohman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zachary P. Hohman. The network helps show where Zachary P. Hohman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Zachary P. Hohman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zachary P. Hohman Line = papers co-authored together Zachary P. Hohman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200859
2 201357
3 201445
4 201144
5 200944
6 201439
7 201336
8 201136
9 201534
10 201328
11 201727
12 201225
13 201119
14 201417
15 201816
16 201716
17 202215
18 201914
19 201713
20 202112

About Zachary P. Hohman

Zachary P. Hohman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 677 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (24 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (12 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (10 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (95 citations), Social Psychology (258 citations), Sociology and Political Science (341 citations), Clinical Psychology (114 citations) and Communication (39 citations). Zachary P. Hohman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Michael A. Hogg, Jason T. Siegel, William D. Crano, Eusebio M. Alvaro, Michelle C. Bligh, Amber M. Gaffney, Justin D. Hackett, Breanna N. Harris, Stephen Miller and David E. Rast. Their work appears in journals such as Self and Identity, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, The Journal of Social Psychology and Prevention Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact