Young‐Bin Cho

19 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers

Young‐Bin Cho
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Radiation 166
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 121
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 65
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 83
  • Genetics 20
Replace Young-Bin Cho with:
Young-Bin Cho Canada
Adam Gladwish Canada
A.W. Sharfo Netherlands
Monica Serban Canada
Ans Swinnen Netherlands
Pittaya Dankulchai Thailand
Georgios Ioannidis Greece
Guoping Shan China
Daniela Smaniotto Italy
H Malhotra United States
Young‐Bin Cho relative to Young-Bin Cho Canada Young-Bin Cho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Young-Bin Cho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Young‐Bin Cho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Young‐Bin Cho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Young‐Bin Cho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Young‐Bin Cho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Young‐Bin Cho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Young‐Bin Cho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Young‐Bin Cho. The network helps show where Young‐Bin Cho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Young‐Bin Cho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Young‐Bin Cho Line = papers co-authored together Young‐Bin Cho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200999
2 200855
3 201045
4 200429
5 201323
6 201817
7 201012
8 201311
9 20098
10 20127
11 20237
12 20207
13 20255
14 20094
15 20233
16 20073
17 20222
18 20142
19 20231
20 20150

About Young‐Bin Cho

Young‐Bin Cho is a scholar working on Radiation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Surgery, having authored 20 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (13 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (2 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Internet of Things and Social Network Interactions (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (1 paper) and Management of metastatic bone disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (166 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (121 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (65 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (83 citations) and Genetics (20 citations). Young‐Bin Cho has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Michael Milosevic, Anthony Fyles, Jason Xie, Valerie Kelly, Joanne Moseley, Karen Lim, Kristy K. Brock, James Stewart, H. Rehbinder and David A. Jaffray. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Physics, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Physics in Medicine and Biology and Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact