Y. Ning

21 papers receiving 509 citations

Peers

Y. Ning
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 16
  • Molecular Biology 292
  • Genetics 117
  • Oncology 100
  • Cancer Research 54
Replace P E Schwartz with:
P E Schwartz United States
Takashi Shinomiya Japan
Franck Brunel France
Stefanie V. Schütz Germany
Olga Tello Argentina
Jianfen Lu United States
Ellen Bretschneider Germany
Chantal Depatie Canada
Aurélia E. Lewis Norway
Amy R. Dwyer Australia
Y. Ning relative to P E Schwartz United States P E Schwartz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
P E Schwartz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Y. Ning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Y. Ning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Y. Ning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Y. Ning more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Y. Ning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Y. Ning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Y. Ning. The network helps show where Y. Ning may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Y. Ning, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Y. Ning Line = papers co-authored together Y. Ning links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993122
2
Molecular characterization of a 130-kb terminal microdeletion at 22q in a child with mild mental retardation.
1997111
3 199582
4 199530
5 201330
6 200720
7 201719
8 201719
9 200815
10 201513
11 201413
12 201612
13 199612
14 20118
15 20167
16 20065
17 20125
18 20073
19 20162
20 20112

About Y. Ning

Y. Ning is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Surgery, having authored 22 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (5 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (4 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (4 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (3 papers), Heat shock proteins research (3 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (3 papers) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (16 citations), Molecular Biology (292 citations), Genetics (117 citations), Oncology (100 citations) and Cancer Research (54 citations). Y. Ning has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Edwin R. Sánchez, Kevin Clark, Jonathan Flint, David H. Ledbetter, Heather E. McDermid, Jan P. Dumanski, Jack Michel Renoir, Robert E. Handschumacher, Kai Hoffmann and Stéphane Le Bihan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, The Pharmacogenomics Journal, Annals of Oncology, Molecular Endocrinology and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact