Xiaoting Pei

622 citations
35 papers · 404 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Xiaoting Pei

30 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers

Xiaoting Pei
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 139
  • Ophthalmology 64
  • Biological Psychiatry 14
  • Sensory Systems 24
  • Aging 7
Replace Ulrikke Voss with:
Ulrikke Voss Sweden
Ayrun Nessa United Kingdom
Seika Kato Japan
Samuel Abokyi Ghana
James Thomas Toguri Canada
Dianna H. Wheaton United States
Ritu Bohat United States
Joshua J. Corrigan United States
Yung‐Mei Chao Taiwan
Xiaoting Pei relative to Ulrikke Voss Sweden Ulrikke Voss's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Ulrikke Voss · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaoting Pei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaoting Pei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaoting Pei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaoting Pei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaoting Pei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaoting Pei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaoting Pei. The network helps show where Xiaoting Pei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaoting Pei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaoting Pei Line = papers co-authored together Xiaoting Pei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201833
2 202131
3 202030
4 202130
5 202030
6 201728
7 202223
8 201823
9 202220
10 202215
11 202114
12 202312
13 202412
14 202312
15 202010
16 202410
17 20229
18 20209
19 20247
20 20237

About Xiaoting Pei

Xiaoting Pei is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Physiology, Ophthalmology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 35 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (11 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (7 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (7 papers), Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions (6 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Advanced Glycation End Products research (3 papers) and Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (139 citations), Ophthalmology (64 citations), Biological Psychiatry (14 citations), Sensory Systems (24 citations) and Aging (7 citations). Xiaoting Pei has collaborated with scholars based in China, Nigeria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Zhijie Li, Dingli Lu, Shenzhen Huang, Xinwei Jiao, Zhiguang Ping, Li Liu, Mustapha Umar Imam, Yanzi Chen, Xiaoli Fu and Zongming Song. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Scientific Reports, The Ocular Surface, Experimental Eye Research and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact