Xiaoting Li

4.2k citations
205 papers · 3.3k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Xiaoting Li

191 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Xiaoting Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Molecular Medicine 120
  • Inorganic Chemistry 259
  • Analytical Chemistry 125
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 19
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 182
Replace Guannan Wang with:
Guannan Wang China
Zheng Liu China
Shiqi Wang China
Kun Qian China
Yue Hu China
Wei Huang China
Yuan Chen China
Bi‐Feng Liu China
Wei Pan China
Lin Wang China
Xiaoting Li relative to Guannan Wang China Guannan Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Guannan Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaoting Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaoting Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaoting Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaoting Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaoting Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaoting Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaoting Li. The network helps show where Xiaoting Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaoting Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaoting Li Line = papers co-authored together Xiaoting Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 205 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019179
2 2018132
3 2019123
4 201890
5 201781
6 202074
7 202065
8 202363
9 201662
10 202361
11 201756
12 201953
13 202453
14 202449
15 201848
16 201947
17 201946
18 202445
19 202442
20 200740

About Xiaoting Li

Xiaoting Li is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Molecular Medicine, Inorganic Chemistry, Cancer Research and Oncology, having authored 205 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Flow Measurement and Analysis (10 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (10 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (9 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (7 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (6 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (5 papers), Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (5 papers) and Advancements in Battery Materials (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (120 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (259 citations), Analytical Chemistry (125 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (19 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (182 citations). Xiaoting Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Wenming Zhang, Man He, Bin Hu, Beibei Chen, Liming Fan, Liying Liu, Naixin Wang, Lide Fang, Ling Li and Qiming Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Immunology, Dyes and Pigments, Chemical Engineering Journal and Journal of Alloys and Compounds.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact