Wouter Hoefsloot

69 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Wouter Hoefsloot
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Small Animals 419
  • Infectious Diseases 736
  • Epidemiology 1.2k
  • Microbiology 22
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 90
Replace Michael Luther with:
Michael Luther United States
Frédéric‐Antoine Dauchy France
Seung Won South Korea
Sally Houston United States
Lena Hjelte Sweden
Kim M. Strohmaier United States
R. Huttunen Finland
Dipti Agarwal India
John Arnold United States
Wouter Hoefsloot relative to Michael Luther United States Michael Luther's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.7×
Michael Luther · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wouter Hoefsloot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter Hoefsloot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter Hoefsloot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter Hoefsloot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter Hoefsloot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter Hoefsloot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter Hoefsloot. The network helps show where Wouter Hoefsloot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wouter Hoefsloot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wouter Hoefsloot Line = papers co-authored together Wouter Hoefsloot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009211
2 2004152
3 2018112
4 200394
5 201876
6 201369
7 201867
8 200965
9 201764
10 200861
11
The changing pattern of clinical Mycobacterium avium isolation in the Netherlands.
201058
12 202056
13 201954
14 202045
15
The rising incidence and clinical relevance of Mycobacterium malmoense: a review of the literature.
200841
16 201240
17 201936
18 201734
19 202134
20 202029

About Wouter Hoefsloot

Wouter Hoefsloot is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Small Animals, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (54 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (27 papers), Infectious Diseases and Mycology (16 papers), Quinazolinone synthesis and applications (10 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis (4 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers) and Medical Research and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (419 citations), Infectious Diseases (736 citations), Epidemiology (1.2k citations), Microbiology (22 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (90 citations). Wouter Hoefsloot has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Jakko van Ingen, Martin J. Boeree, Dick van Soolingen, P.N.R. Dekhuijzen, Wiel C.M. de Lange, Roland Diel, Sanne M.H. Zweijpfenning, Marc Lipman, Sarah Bendien and Cecile Magis‐Escurra. Their work appears in journals such as Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, ERJ Open Research, Respiratory Medicine and Tuberculosis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact