Wouter Graef
Impact in
-
- Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
-
- Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
Papers in
-
- Plasma Diagnostics and Applications 12
-
- Plasma Applications and Diagnostics 5
- Co-authors
- E. Carbone (7 shared papers)Jan van Dijk (7 shared papers)Matt Hopkins (1 shared paper)J. Stephens (1 shared paper)Benjamin Yee (1 shared paper)Sergey Pancheshnyi (1 shared paper)Gerjan J. M. Hagelaar (1 shared paper)Leanne C. Pitchford (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Physics D Applied Physics (3 papers)Plasma Sources Science and Technology (2 papers)Plasma Processes and Polymers (2 papers)Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy (1 paper)Journal of Instrumentation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyFrance
In The Last Decade
Wouter Graef
13 papers receiving 358 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 160
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 193
- Catalysis 16
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 67
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 24
Countries citing papers authored by Wouter Graef
This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter Graef's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter Graef with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter Graef more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter Graef
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter Graef. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter Graef. The network helps show where Wouter Graef may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wouter Graef, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 128 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 73 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 13 | LXCat 3:A novel data platform for low temperature plasma physics | 2023 | 1 |
About Wouter Graef
Wouter Graef is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (12 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (5 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (3 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (1 paper), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (1 paper), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (1 paper) and Model Reduction and Neural Networks (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (160 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (193 citations), Catalysis (16 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (67 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (24 citations). Wouter Graef has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include E. Carbone, Jan van Dijk, Matt Hopkins, J. Stephens, Benjamin Yee, Sergey Pancheshnyi, Gerjan J. M. Hagelaar, Leanne C. Pitchford, Annemie Bogaerts and D Mihailova. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, Plasma Sources Science and Technology, Plasma Processes and Polymers, Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy and Journal of Instrumentation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.