Wouter Gheyle

781 citations
40 papers · 546 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Wouter Gheyle

38 papers receiving 499 citations

Peers

Wouter Gheyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Space and Planetary Science 328
  • Geology 243
  • Paleontology 110
  • Archeology 136
  • Conservation 36
Replace Birger Stichelbaut with:
Birger Stichelbaut Belgium
Gino Caspari Switzerland
Arnau Garcia‐Molsosa Spain
Robert Bewley United Kingdom
J. McCarthy Australia
Dylan S. Davis United States
Philip Verhagen Netherlands
Véronique De Laet Belgium
Francesc C. Conesa Spain
Henry Chapman United Kingdom
Wouter Gheyle relative to Birger Stichelbaut Belgium Birger Stichelbaut's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Birger Stichelbaut · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wouter Gheyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter Gheyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter Gheyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter Gheyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter Gheyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter Gheyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter Gheyle. The network helps show where Wouter Gheyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Wouter Gheyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wouter Gheyle Line = papers co-authored together Wouter Gheyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200572
2 201151
3 201248
4
The deteriorating preservation of the Altai Rock art: assessing three-dimensional image-based modelling in rock art research and management
201240
5 201737
6 200434
7 201323
8 200721
9 201121
10 201520
11 201719
12 202116
13 201615
14 201115
15 201514
16 201812
17 201711
18 20187
19 20147
20 20177

About Wouter Gheyle

Wouter Gheyle is a scholar working on Space and Planetary Science, Geology, Archeology, Paleontology and Ocean Engineering, having authored 40 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeological Research and Protection (27 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (16 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (13 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (8 papers), Geophysical Methods and Applications (5 papers), Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction (4 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (4 papers) and Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (328 citations), Geology (243 citations), Paleontology (110 citations), Archeology (136 citations) and Conservation (36 citations). Wouter Gheyle has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jean Bourgeois, Rudi Goossens, Birger Stichelbaut, Alain De Wulf, Veerle Van Eetvelde, Marc Van Meirvenne, Timothy Saey, Gertjan Plets, Jeroen De Reu and Geert Verhoeven. Their work appears in journals such as Antiquity, Archaeological Prospection, Archaeological Research in Asia, Geoderma and Geoarchaeology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact