Wouter A. Moojen

1.4k citations
52 papers · 855 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Wouter A. Moojen

46 papers receiving 839 citations

Peers

Wouter A. Moojen
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 302
  • Neurology 97
  • Surgery 269
  • Pharmacology 71
  • Medical Terminology 1
Replace R. Carter Cassidy with:
R. Carter Cassidy United States
Gareth Roberts United Kingdom
Tarkan Ergün Türkiye
Lisbeth Mathus-Vliegen Netherlands
Raphaële Charest-Morin Canada
Nandini Patel United States
Raja Rampersaud Canada
Rani Nasser United States
T. Hashimoto Japan
Robert J. Trager United States
Wouter A. Moojen relative to R. Carter Cassidy United States R. Carter Cassidy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.9×
R. Carter Cassidy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wouter A. Moojen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter A. Moojen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter A. Moojen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter A. Moojen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter A. Moojen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter A. Moojen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter A. Moojen. The network helps show where Wouter A. Moojen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wouter A. Moojen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wouter A. Moojen Line = papers co-authored together Wouter A. Moojen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009116
2 201361
3 201354
4 201153
5 201149
6 201848
7 202240
8 201534
9 201333
10 201728
11 202025
12 202024
13 201023
14 201420
15 201520
16 202020
17 202117
18 201716
19 201815
20 201915

About Wouter A. Moojen

Wouter A. Moojen is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Epidemiology, Surgery and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 52 papers that have together received 855 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (16 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (9 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (6 papers), Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (2 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (2 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (2 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (2 papers) and Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (302 citations), Neurology (97 citations), Surgery (269 citations), Pharmacology (71 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). Wouter A. Moojen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wilco C. Peul, Carmen Vleggeert‐Lankamp, Mark P. Arts, Wilco Jacobs, Inne H.M. Borel Rinkes, Richard van Hillegersberg, M.E.I. Schipper, J. Boone, Ronald Bartels and Marike L. D. Broekman. Their work appears in journals such as European Spine Journal, Acta Neurochirurgica, The Spine Journal, BMJ Open and Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact