Wolfram Stör

505 citations
19 papers · 290 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Wolfram Stör

9 papers receiving 250 citations

Peers

Wolfram Stör
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 150
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 21
  • Cell Biology 115
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 63
  • Pharmacology 38
Replace Sigrid Mank with:
Sigrid Mank Germany
Jochen Gleditsch Germany
S. Reitmayr Germany
M. Thomas Sweden
Daniela Zaps United States
Jo-Tong Chen Taiwan
Jo L.M. Franssen Netherlands
Shu-Min Chen Taiwan
Aldo Liguori Italy
David Alimi France
Wolfram Stör relative to Sigrid Mank Germany Sigrid Mank's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Sigrid Mank · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wolfram Stör

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wolfram Stör's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolfram Stör with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfram Stör more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wolfram Stör

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolfram Stör. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolfram Stör. The network helps show where Wolfram Stör may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Wolfram Stör, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wolfram Stör Line = papers co-authored together Wolfram Stör links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2002202
2 199648
3 200919
4 20098
5 20095
6 20043
7 20161
8 20111
9 20101
10 20031
11 20051
12 20230
13 20170
14 20170
15 20190
16 20130
17 20180
18 20140
19 20100

About Wolfram Stör

Wolfram Stör is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Cell Biology, Surgery, Psychiatry and Mental health and Strategy and Management, having authored 19 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (15 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (11 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (6 papers), Biomedical and Chemical Research (4 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (1 paper), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper) and Diverse Legal and Medical Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (150 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (21 citations), Cell Biology (115 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (63 citations) and Pharmacology (38 citations). Wolfram Stör has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Dominik Irnich, Jochen Gleditsch, Peter Schöps, Andrew J. Vickers, Martin A. Schreiber, Antje Beyer, F. Worku, Klaus Linde, Dieter Melchart and Raymund Pothmann. Their work appears in journals such as Deutsche Zeitschrift für Akupunktur, The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Pain, Complementary Medicine Research and Der Anaesthesist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact