William Todd Schultz
Impact in
- General Psychology top 10%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
-
- Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Papers in
-
- American and British Literature Analysis 3
- Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis 2
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism 2
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 1
- Themes in Literature Analysis 1
- Co-authors
- Yufeng Yao (1 shared paper)John Singleton (1 shared paper)Ellis Johnson (1 shared paper)Özlem Ergün (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biography (3 papers)American imago (1 paper)American Psychologist (1 paper)European Journal of Operational Research (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
William Todd Schultz
7 papers receiving 65 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- General Psychology 14
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 36
- Social Psychology 34
- Applied Psychology 6
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 9
Countries citing papers authored by William Todd Schultz
This map shows the geographic impact of William Todd Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Todd Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Todd Schultz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Todd Schultz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Todd Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Todd Schultz. The network helps show where William Todd Schultz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside William Todd Schultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 38 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 10 | |
| 4 | An Emergency in Slow Motion: The Inner Life of Diane Arbus | 2011 | 6 |
| 5 | 1998 | 4 | |
| 6 | Torment Saint: The Life of Elliott Smith | 2013 | 4 |
| 7 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 0 |
About William Todd Schultz
William Todd Schultz is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology, History, Aerospace Engineering and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 78 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American and British Literature Analysis (3 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (2 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper), Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods (1 paper), Themes in Literature Analysis (1 paper), Optimization and Packing Problems (1 paper) and Air Traffic Management and Optimization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (14 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (36 citations), Social Psychology (34 citations), Applied Psychology (6 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (9 citations). William Todd Schultz has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Yufeng Yao, John Singleton, Ellis Johnson and Özlem Ergün. Their work appears in journals such as Biography, American imago, American Psychologist, European Journal of Operational Research and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.