William Sweet

612 citations
121 papers · 328 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

William Sweet

88 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers

William Sweet
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • General Psychology 11
  • History and Philosophy of Science 35
  • Philosophy 38
  • Political Science and International Relations 61
  • Theoretical Computer Science 3
Replace KENNETH S. FRIEDMAN with:
KENNETH S. FRIEDMAN United States
Peter B. M. Vranas United States
Joel Katzav Netherlands
Edward Stein United States
Friedel Weinert United Kingdom
William Kingdon Clifford Ireland
Andrew I. Dale South Africa
Charles Weiner United States
Jean Le Rond d' Alembert
David C. Cassidy United States
William Sweet relative to KENNETH S. FRIEDMAN United States KENNETH S. FRIEDMAN's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19×
KENNETH S. FRIEDMAN · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Sweet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Sweet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Sweet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Sweet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Sweet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Sweet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Sweet. The network helps show where William Sweet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Sweet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Sweet Line = papers co-authored together William Sweet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 121 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Idealism and Rights: The Social Ontology of Human Rights in the Political Thought of Bernard Bosanquet
199641
2 200836
3 199517
4 202416
5 199214
6 199114
7 200011
8 20038
9 20247
10
The philosophical theory of the state and related essays
19997
11 20115
12 20075
13 19775
14 20164
15 19904
16
Hume's Reception in Early America
20024
17 19724
18 19983
19 19913
20 19923

About William Sweet

William Sweet is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Philosophy and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 121 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Theory and Influence (13 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers), Religious Education and Schools (6 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (6 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (6 papers), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (11 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (35 citations), Philosophy (38 citations), Political Science and International Relations (61 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (3 citations). William Sweet has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jean Kumagai, Hamed Moftakhari, Hamid Moradkhani, Bernard Bosanquet, Stephen Cass, David F. Muñoz, Gerald Gaus, Richard G. Geyer, David C. Cassidy and Matthew J. Widlansky. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Today, Toronto Journal of Theology, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Frontiers in Marine Science and Sophia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact