William Steiger

58 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

William Steiger
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 284
  • Statistics and Probability 370
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 72
  • Applied Mathematics 176
  • Finance 135
Replace J. E. Yukich with:
J. E. Yukich United States
Bruce Jay Collings United States
Richard Sinkhorn United States
Serge Dubuc Canada
Günter Last Germany
Colin L. Mallows United States
C. A. Rogers United Kingdom
Joseph P. S. Kung United States
Harold R. Parks United States
Filippo Santambrogio France
William Steiger relative to J. E. Yukich United States J. E. Yukich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
J. E. Yukich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Steiger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Steiger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Steiger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Steiger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Steiger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Steiger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Steiger. The network helps show where William Steiger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Steiger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Steiger Line = papers co-authored together William Steiger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983373
2 1984100
3 198094
4 198984
5 197459
6 199457
7 197456
8 198644
9 199243
10 197934
11 199534
12 198831
13 199225
14 197423
15 196920
16 198619
17 198917
18 198917
19 200015
20 199915

About William Steiger

William Steiger is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Statistics and Probability, Applied Mathematics and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (21 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (7 papers), Digital Image Processing Techniques (7 papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (7 papers), Point processes and geometric inequalities (6 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (6 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (5 papers) and Data Management and Algorithms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (284 citations), Statistics and Probability (370 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (72 citations), Applied Mathematics (176 citations) and Finance (135 citations). William Steiger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Peter Bloomfield, Endre Szemerédi, Marek Kanter, Jeffrey S. Salowe, Jiřı́ Matoušek, John Steele, Chi-Yuan Lo, Richard Cole, János Pach and Shulamith T. Gross. Their work appears in journals such as Discrete & Computational Geometry, Journal of Applied Probability, Mathematics of Computation, Discrete Applied Mathematics and Probability Theory and Related Fields.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact