William Smith

507 citations
26 papers · 391 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

William Smith

23 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers

William Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 221
  • Computational Mechanics 80
  • Automotive Engineering 45
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 60
  • Soil Science 28
Replace Krzysztof Skonieczny with:
Krzysztof Skonieczny Canada
R. Lindemann United States
D. Rubinstein Israel
P. Bellutta United States
Hassan Shibly United States
Ramón González United States
Yoji KURODA Japan
Masatsugu Otsuki Japan
Y. G. Tsuei United States
Giacomo Frulla Italy
William Smith relative to Krzysztof Skonieczny Canada Krzysztof Skonieczny's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Krzysztof Skonieczny · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Smith. The network helps show where William Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Smith Line = papers co-authored together William Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201386
2 201450
3 201933
4 201131
5 202224
6 201224
7 199319
8 200018
9 201715
10 201915
11 199910
12 20199
13 20208
14 20207
15 20117
16 19817
17 20116
18 20185
19 20154
20 19784

About William Smith

William Smith is a scholar working on Civil and Structural Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 26 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics (8 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (5 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (4 papers), Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference (3 papers), Soil Management and Crop Yield (3 papers), Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization (3 papers), Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis (2 papers) and Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Civil and Structural Engineering (221 citations), Computational Mechanics (80 citations), Automotive Engineering (45 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (60 citations) and Soil Science (28 citations). William Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Huei Peng, Zhenzhong Jia, Kira Barton, Denise Rizzo, Matthew P. Castanier, Lauro Ojeda, Karl Iagnemma, Daniel Melanz, Carmine Senatore and Bo Fu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Terramechanics, Robotica, Journal of Field Robotics, Robotics and Autonomous Systems and IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact