William O’Connell

459 citations
18 papers · 400 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

William O’Connell

18 papers receiving 350 citations

Peers

William O’Connell
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 181
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 154
  • Ophthalmology 22
  • Surgery 69
  • Nephrology 11
Replace Anja Leuschner with:
Anja Leuschner Germany
G Paolini Italy
Pierre G. Melon Belgium
Naoko Mizukami Japan
Takatomo Nakajima Japan
Jaime Figueras Spain
Munetaka Sugiishi Japan
Kazushige Isojima Japan
Yusuke Kodama Japan
Andrea Grosso Italy
William O’Connell relative to Anja Leuschner Germany Anja Leuschner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Anja Leuschner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William O’Connell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William O’Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William O’Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William O’Connell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William O’Connell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William O’Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William O’Connell. The network helps show where William O’Connell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William O’Connell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William O’Connell Line = papers co-authored together William O’Connell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 198297
2 198455
3 198548
4 200047
5 198445
6 198626
7 198425
8 200625
9
High sensitivity localization of parathyroid tumors by nuclear imaging in 50 proven cases
19849
10 19826
11 19826
12 19823
13 19822
14 19862
15
Blood pool scintigraphy of the heart: current status
19821
16 19851
17
Color as a tool for image comparison.
19881
18 19931

About William O’Connell

William O’Connell is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Ophthalmology and Surgery, having authored 18 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (10 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (2 papers), Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery (2 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers), Color perception and design (1 paper), Image Enhancement Techniques (1 paper) and Color Science and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (181 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (154 citations), Ophthalmology (22 citations), Surgery (69 citations) and Nephrology (11 citations). William O’Connell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Elias H. Botvinick, Dale W. Shosa, D. Faulkner, Michael A. Frais, Michael W. Dae, Richard F. Dunn, Robert J. Herfkens, Melvin M. Scheinman, Peter Lanzer and Orlo H. Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, The American Journal of Cardiology, Circulation, Journal of Glaucoma and Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact