William New

647 citations
13 papers · 538 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

William New

11 papers receiving 466 citations

Peers

William New
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 77
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 115
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 161
  • Biomedical Engineering 238
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 24
Replace Hans‐Bernd Hopf with:
Hans‐Bernd Hopf Germany
Roxann D. Barnes United States
Christian M. Alexander United States
Ahmed F. Ghouri United States
Magnus Vegfors Sweden
Wolfgang Lixfeld Canada
Thilo Fleck Germany
Lynn E. Teller United States
Richard Sartene France
Norma Boone Goldberg United States
William New relative to Hans‐Bernd Hopf Germany Hans‐Bernd Hopf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Hans‐Bernd Hopf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William New

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William New's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William New with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William New more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William New

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William New. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William New. The network helps show where William New may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside William New, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William New Line = papers co-authored together William New links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1983420
2 198535
3 200928
4 198421
5 198215
6 197910
7 19804
8 19792
9 20051
10 20191
11 20191
12
Massive condylomata acuminata.
20080
13 20240

About William New

William New is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (4 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (2 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (1 paper), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (1 paper), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (1 paper) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (77 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (115 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (161 citations), Biomedical Engineering (238 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (24 citations). William New has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mark Yelderman, Jack Chalon, Bożena Kamińska, Alireza Akhbardeh, Viatcheslav Gurev, Natalia A. Trayanova, Kouhyar Tavakolian, Gerald D. Silverberg, Gordon A Ross and Myer H. Rosenthal. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, The FASEB Journal, Neurosurgery, The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Survey of Anesthesiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact