William McKay

48 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

William McKay
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Neurology 497
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 772
  • Rehabilitation 258
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 81
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 266
Replace Christie K. Ferreira with:
Christie K. Ferreira United States
Maria Knikou United States
James G. Broton United States
Ursula S. Hofstoetter Austria
Floyd J. Thompson United States
Michèle Hubli Switzerland
Andrea Willhite United States
Т. Р. Мошонкина Russia
Martin Ballegaard Denmark
Victor De Pasqua Belgium
William McKay relative to Christie K. Ferreira United States Christie K. Ferreira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Christie K. Ferreira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William McKay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William McKay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William McKay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William McKay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William McKay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William McKay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William McKay. The network helps show where William McKay may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William McKay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William McKay Line = papers co-authored together William McKay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013135
2 2015117
3 1980108
4 1995105
5 1996105
6 2015102
7 200495
8 199672
9 201662
10 200356
11 199254
12 199253
13 199747
14 201044
15 201841
16 201137
17 201333
18 200532
19 201029
20 200428

About William McKay

William McKay is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Neurology, Surgery and Rehabilitation, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (22 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (15 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (12 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (7 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (6 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (5 papers) and Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (497 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (772 citations), Rehabilitation (258 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (81 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (266 citations). William McKay has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include A.M. Sherwood, M.R. Dimitrijević, Dobrivoje S. Stokić, Ursula S. Hofstoetter, Karen Minassian, Winfried Mayr, Keith E. Tansey, Alexander Ovechkin, Hyun Kyoon Lim and Daniela Terson de Paleville. Their work appears in journals such as Spinal Cord, Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology, Muscle & Nerve, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery and Experimental Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact