William M. Marks

41 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

William M. Marks
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 132
  • Hepatology 214
  • Oncology 451
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 327
  • Surgery 564
Replace W. Dennis Foley with:
W. Dennis Foley United States
Hanh V. Nghiem United States
Erik K. Paulson United States
Martin E O'Malley Canada
Eric W. Olcott United States
Thomas L. Lawson United States
Anne R. Buckley Canada
Mustafa Nasuh Ozmen Türkiye
S Chagnon France
Rick I. Feld United States
William M. Marks relative to W. Dennis Foley United States W. Dennis Foley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
W. Dennis Foley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William M. Marks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William M. Marks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. Marks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. Marks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William M. Marks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. Marks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. Marks. The network helps show where William M. Marks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William M. Marks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William M. Marks Line = papers co-authored together William M. Marks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986258
2 1988258
3 2009107
4 1986101
5 198795
6 198689
7 198083
8 198083
9 197879
10 197970
11 198666
12 198160
13 198253
14
Dermoid cysts of the ovary: their ultrasonographic appearances.
198148
15 198247
16 198347
17 197941
18 198436
19 198230
20 198327

About William M. Marks

William M. Marks is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Hepatology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (8 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (4 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (3 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (3 papers), Radiology practices and education (3 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (3 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (3 papers) and Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (132 citations), Hepatology (214 citations), Oncology (451 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (327 citations) and Surgery (564 citations). William M. Marks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Guatemala and Democratic Republic of the Congo. Frequent co-authors include Patrick C. Freeny, John A. Ryan, PC Freeny, Roy A. Filly, John W. Bolen, L. William Traverso, Peter W. Callen, Robert D. Harris, P W Callen and Arthur B. Dublin. Their work appears in journals such as Radiology, American Journal of Roentgenology, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, British Journal of Radiology and Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact