William K. Read

620 citations
23 papers · 528 · h-index 13

Impact in

  • Equine top 5%
    • Veterinary Equine Medical Research
    • Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology

Papers in

William K. Read

23 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

William K. Read
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Equine 42
  • Small Animals 96
  • Parasitology 32
  • Endocrinology 24
  • Ophthalmology 35
Replace JOAN R. REST with:
JOAN R. REST United Kingdom
B. R. H. Farrow Australia
Murray M. Lipton United States
Emanuele Ricci United Kingdom
M. A. Thrall United States
Daniel A. Ward United States
Milton Wyman United States
David T. Ramsey United States
James R. McClure United States
Leipold Hw
William K. Read relative to JOAN R. REST United Kingdom JOAN R. REST's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12×
JOAN R. REST · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William K. Read

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William K. Read's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William K. Read with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William K. Read more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William K. Read

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William K. Read. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William K. Read. The network helps show where William K. Read may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William K. Read, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William K. Read Line = papers co-authored together William K. Read links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A collagenous tissue dysplasia of calves.
197077
2 198365
3 197760
4
Study of chloroquine toxicity and a drug-induced cerebrospinal lipodystrophy in swine.
196845
5 198739
6 196934
7 199227
8 196826
9 200122
10 196922
11 199818
12 199814
13 198614
14 197911
15 199011
16 199011
17 19809
18 19707
19 19884
20 19914

About William K. Read

William K. Read is a scholar working on Small Animals, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Rheumatology, Equine and Neurology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Oncology Research (3 papers), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (3 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (2 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (2 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (2 papers), Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (2 papers) and Nuclear Structure and Function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (42 citations), Small Animals (96 citations), Parasitology (32 citations), Endocrinology (24 citations) and Ophthalmology (35 citations). William K. Read has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Charles H. Bridges, Patrick J. O’Hara, Kenneth R. Pierce, H. Phil Hobson, Chester A. Gleiser, T. W. Dukes, Gail Williams, L. Garry Adams, Robert G. Yaeger and FRED ANTHONY MANN. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Veterinary Pathology, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association and Veterinary Record.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact