William Hurst

903 citations
42 papers · 467 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

William Hurst

34 papers receiving 367 citations

Peers

William Hurst
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Political Science and International Relations 305
  • Public Administration 26
  • Urban Studies 44
  • Law 65
  • Sociology and Political Science 243
Replace Christopher Leo with:
Christopher Leo Canada
Murray Scot Tanner United States
Giovanni Carbone Italy
James S. Wunsch United States
Olle Törnquist Norway
Helene Sjursen Norway
Louise Tillin United Kingdom
Joyce K. Kallgren United States
Gerard Alexander United States
Jeffrey W. Paller United States
William Hurst relative to Christopher Leo Canada Christopher Leo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Christopher Leo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Hurst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Hurst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Hurst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Hurst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Hurst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Hurst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Hurst. The network helps show where William Hurst may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside William Hurst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Hurst Line = papers co-authored together William Hurst links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009153
2 201594
3 201537
4 200831
5
Laid-off workers in a workers' state: Unemployment with chinese characteristics
200921
6 201418
7 201814
8
Conflict in Laos
196410
9 20118
10 20068
11 20148
12 20108
13
Analysis in limbo? Contemporary chinese politics amid the maturation of Reform
20036
14 20166
15 20186
16 20144
17 20094
18 20023
19 20143
20 20043

About William Hurst

William Hurst is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Law, Gender Studies and Urban Studies, having authored 42 papers that have together received 467 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (19 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (7 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (5 papers), Asian Studies and History (4 papers), Legal Studies and Policies (3 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (3 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (2 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (305 citations), Public Administration (26 citations), Urban Studies (44 citations), Law (65 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (243 citations). William Hurst has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Christian Sorace, T. Gold, Qiang Li, Jessica C. Teets, Lowell Dittmer, Kevin J. O’Brien, Ran Tao, Gregory Shaffer, Juan Carlos Botero and Tom Ginsburg. Their work appears in journals such as Indonesia, The China Quarterly, Perspectives on Politics, Journal of East Asian Studies and China Information.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact