William H. Redd

10.6k citations
164 papers · 8.7k · h-index 54

Impact in

Papers in

William H. Redd

160 papers receiving 8.1k citations

Peers

William H. Redd
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 2.7k
  • Oncology 2.2k
  • Applied Psychology 376
  • Clinical Psychology 1.4k
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 296
Replace Robert Zachariae with:
Robert Zachariae Denmark
Laura S. Porter United States
Sharon L. Manne United States
Gerry Humphris United Kingdom
Barry Rosenfeld United States
Louise Sharpe Australia
Patrick O. Monahan United States
Hans Ivers Canada
Hugo J. Duivenvoorden Netherlands
Martha A. Grootenhuis Netherlands
William H. Redd relative to Robert Zachariae Denmark Robert Zachariae's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Robert Zachariae · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William H. Redd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Redd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Redd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Redd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William H. Redd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Redd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Redd. The network helps show where William H. Redd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William H. Redd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William H. Redd Line = papers co-authored together William H. Redd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 164 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995390
2 2000378
3 2003369
4 2008248
5 1999205
6 2001200
7 1992195
8 1999187
9 1998181
10 1990179
11 2008163
12 1987162
13 2014160
14 2003152
15 1990143
16 1987140
17 1997136
18 1990128
19 1982124
20 2010123

About William H. Redd

William H. Redd is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Oncology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Surgery, having authored 164 papers that have together received 8.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (44 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (33 papers), Family Support in Illness (27 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (22 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (17 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (14 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (14 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (2.7k citations), Oncology (2.2k citations), Applied Psychology (376 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.4k citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (296 citations). William H. Redd has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Iceland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Katherine N. DuHamel, Paul B. Jacobsen, Sharon L. Manne, Michael A. Andrykowski, Guy H. Montgomery, Gary Winkel, Dana H. Bovbjerg, Heiðdís Valdimarsdóttir, Christine Rini and Lina Jandorf. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Psycho-Oncology, Cancer, Health Psychology and Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact