William Geoffrey Wright

71 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

William Geoffrey Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 411
  • Rehabilitation 138
  • Neurology 171
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 356
  • Neurology 256
Replace Julia M. Treleaven with:
Julia M. Treleaven Australia
Yohei Otaka Japan
Augusto Fusco Italy
Rodrigo Rocha Vitório Brazil
Hannes Devos United States
Robert H. Brey United States
I. Bonan France
William R. Young United Kingdom
Marco Tramontano Italy
Lisa Alcock United Kingdom
William Geoffrey Wright relative to Julia M. Treleaven Australia Julia M. Treleaven's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Julia M. Treleaven · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Geoffrey Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Geoffrey Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Geoffrey Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Geoffrey Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Geoffrey Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Geoffrey Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Geoffrey Wright. The network helps show where William Geoffrey Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Geoffrey Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Geoffrey Wright Line = papers co-authored together William Geoffrey Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007122
2 2011105
3 2008103
4 201081
5 201468
6 201264
7 201560
8 200560
9 201758
10 200548
11 201647
12 200646
13 201439
14 200937
15 201732
16 201632
17 200732
18 201028
19 201727
20 202225

About William Geoffrey Wright

William Geoffrey Wright is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Cognitive Neuroscience, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Neurology and Epidemiology, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (23 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (15 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (12 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (9 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (8 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (7 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (411 citations), Rehabilitation (138 citations), Neurology (171 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (356 citations) and Neurology (256 citations). William Geoffrey Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Victor S. Gurfinkel, Fay Bahling Horak, Paul J. Cordo, Ryan Tierney, Yuri P. Ivanenko, Jane K. McDevitt, Francis Jay Haran, John G. Nutt, James R. Lackner and Paul A. DiZio. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Brain Research, PLoS ONE, Journal of Vestibular Research, International Journal of Sports Medicine and Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact