William E. Lievens

402 citations
8 papers · 253 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

William E. Lievens

7 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers

William E. Lievens
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 177
  • Human-Computer Interaction 15
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 40
  • Signal Processing 24
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 27
Replace Pearce Korb with:
Pearce Korb United States
Jeong-Youn Kim South Korea
Brian Scally United Kingdom
David P. Ibañez China
R. Fronsko Australia
Gerald Pichler Austria
Yoon Gi Chung South Korea
Partha Thirumala United States
Janna Cheek United States
Dragos Sabau United States
William E. Lievens relative to Pearce Korb United States Pearce Korb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Pearce Korb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Lievens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Lievens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Lievens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Lievens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Lievens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Lievens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Lievens. The network helps show where William E. Lievens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside William E. Lievens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Lievens Line = papers co-authored together William E. Lievens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2016233
2
The Developmental EEG: Premature, Neonatal, Infant, and Children
201610
3
The Abnormal EEG
20164
4
The Normal EEG
20162
5
Appendix 1. The Scientific Basis of EEG: Neurophysiology of EEG Generation in the Brain
20162
6
Benign Variants in the EEG
20161
7
An Orderly Approach to EEG Analysis: Visual Inspection of the Background and Pattern Recognition
20161
8
Appendix 4. Common Artifacts During EEG Recording
20160

About William E. Lievens

William E. Lievens is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Psychiatry and Mental health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 253 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (1 paper), Epilepsy research and treatment (1 paper), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper) and Neural Networks and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (177 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (15 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (40 citations), Signal Processing (24 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (27 citations). William E. Lievens has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Pearce Korb, Erik K. St. Louis, Mohamad Z. Koubeissi, Jeffrey W. Britton, Elia Pestana‐Knight, Jennifer L. Hopp, Lauren Frey and Lauren C. Frey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact