William Canak

19 papers receiving 487 citations

Peers

William Canak
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Development 71
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 131
  • Public Administration 54
  • Political Science and International Relations 268
  • Economics and Econometrics 203
Replace J. L. Porket with:
J. L. Porket United Kingdom
Charles P. Oman France
W. G. Huff United Kingdom
Martin Hart‐Landsberg United States
Linda Lim United States
Holland Hunter United States
Ann Capling Australia
Iyanatul Islam Australia
Chung‐in Moon South Korea
Yusuf Bangura Switzerland
William Canak relative to J. L. Porket United Kingdom J. L. Porket's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
J. L. Porket · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Canak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Canak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Canak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Canak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Canak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Canak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Canak. The network helps show where William Canak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside William Canak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Canak Line = papers co-authored together William Canak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987412
2 198775
3 199132
4 199031
5 198420
6 198115
7 19908
8 19917
9 19817
10 19865
11 19904
12 19772
13 19962
14 19871
15 19861
16 19891
17 20031
18 19911
19 19911
20 19810

About William Canak

William Canak is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration, Accounting and Urban Studies, having authored 23 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (5 papers), Global Health Care Issues (1 paper), World Systems and Global Transformations (1 paper), Latin American Urban Studies (1 paper), Rural development and sustainability (1 paper), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (1 paper), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (1 paper) and Political Economy and Marxism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (71 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (131 citations), Public Administration (54 citations), Political Science and International Relations (268 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (203 citations). William Canak has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Volker Bornschier, Christopher Chase‐Dunn, Ivo D. Duchacek, William C. Schaniel, Alejandro Portes, Joel A. Devine, Michael P. Todaro, William Foote Whyte, Thomas Koenig and Giorgio Alberti. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Latin American Research Review, Social Problems and International Migration Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact