William C. Pearson
Impact in
- Geophysics top 5%
- Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
- Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
- Seismic Waves and Analysis
- Ocean Engineering top 5%
- Geophysical Methods and Applications
Papers in
-
- Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods 7
-
- Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping 5
- Co-authors
- John W. Peirce (2 shared papers)M. E. Ruder (1 shared paper)R. O. Hansen (1 shared paper)V.J.S. Grauch (1 shared paper)Jeffrey D. Phillips (1 shared paper)Mark E. Ander (1 shared paper)Misac N. Nabighian (1 shared paper)T. R. LaFehr (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Computers & Geosciences (1 paper)Geophysics (1 paper)The Mountain Geologist (1 paper)Offshore Technology Conference (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
William C. Pearson
13 papers receiving 281 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Geophysics 237
- Ocean Engineering 109
- Oceanography 85
- Geology 31
- Geochemistry and Petrology 13
Countries citing papers authored by William C. Pearson
This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Pearson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Pearson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Pearson. The network helps show where William C. Pearson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside William C. Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 254 | |
| 2 | 1982 | 13 | |
| 3 | CULTURAL EDITING OF HRAM DATA COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES | 1998 | 8 |
| 4 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 6 | ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE SANDING AND DEICING PRACTICES. FINAL REPORT | 1995 | 3 |
| 7 | 1988 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1975 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 15 | Gravity Exploration for Petroleum in Railroad Valley, Nevada | 1979 | 1 |
| 16 | 2004 | 1 |
About William C. Pearson
William C. Pearson is a scholar working on Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence, Geology, Oceanography and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 16 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (7 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (5 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (5 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (5 papers), Geological formations and processes (2 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (2 papers), Geological Modeling and Analysis (2 papers) and Geological Studies and Exploration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (237 citations), Ocean Engineering (109 citations), Oceanography (85 citations), Geology (31 citations) and Geochemistry and Petrology (13 citations). William C. Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include John W. Peirce, M. E. Ruder, R. O. Hansen, V.J.S. Grauch, Jeffrey D. Phillips, Mark E. Ander, Misac N. Nabighian, T. R. LaFehr, Christopher Skinner and C. R. B. Lister. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Geosciences, Geophysics, The Mountain Geologist and Offshore Technology Conference.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.