William C. McDermott
Impact in
- Anthropology top 10%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
-
- Medieval Literature and History
Papers in
- Anthropology 14
- Classical Antiquity Studies 13
-
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 3
- Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies 1
- Co-authors
- A. N. Sherwin-White (1 shared paper)Werner Eck (1 shared paper)R. G. M. Nisbet (1 shared paper)M. Gwyn Morgan (1 shared paper)Moses Hadas (1 shared paper)W. K. Lacey (1 shared paper)John V. A. Fine (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Classical World (5 papers)The American Journal of Philology (4 papers)Vigiliae Christianae (2 papers)Ancient Society (2 papers)Phoenix (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William C. McDermott
18 papers receiving 45 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
- Anthropology 55
- Classics 10
- Archeology 24
- History 16
- Life-span and Life-course Studies 1
Countries citing papers authored by William C. McDermott
This map shows the geographic impact of William C. McDermott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. McDermott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. McDermott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William C. McDermott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. McDermott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. McDermott. The network helps show where William C. McDermott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside William C. McDermott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1969 | 15 | |
| 2 | 1972 | 10 | |
| 3 | 1975 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1975 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1977 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1980 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1960 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1973 | 3 | |
| 9 | Caesar's Projected Dacian-Parthian Expedition. | 1982 | 2 |
| 10 | 1971 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1972 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1977 | 2 | |
| 13 | Stemmata quid faciunt? The Descendants of Frontinus. | 1976 | 1 |
| 14 | 1970 | 1 | |
| 15 | Cicero and Catullus | 1980 | 1 |
| 16 | 1969 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1961 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1970 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1971 | 1 |
About William C. McDermott
William C. McDermott is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology, Organic Chemistry, History and Classics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 72 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (13 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (4 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers), Classical Studies and Legal History (3 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper) and Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (55 citations), Classics (10 citations), Archeology (24 citations), History (16 citations) and Life-span and Life-course Studies (1 citation). William C. McDermott has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include A. N. Sherwin-White, Werner Eck, R. G. M. Nisbet, M. Gwyn Morgan, Moses Hadas, W. K. Lacey and John V. A. Fine. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, The American Journal of Philology, Vigiliae Christianae, Ancient Society and Phoenix.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.