William C. Condit

452 citations
15 papers · 334 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

William C. Condit

14 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

William C. Condit
Comparison fields: 5 of 14
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 224
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 37
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 60
  • Control and Systems Engineering 47
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 58
Replace S.W. Seiler with:
S.W. Seiler United States
M. L. Sloan United States
A. A. Ware United States
Harvey M. Skarsgard Canada
Willard H. Bennett United States
C. Litwin United States
Ryo Sugihara Japan
Sarah J. Messer United States
Alexander V. Gordeev Russia
A. Salat Germany
William C. Condit relative to S.W. Seiler United States S.W. Seiler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
S.W. Seiler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William C. Condit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Condit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Condit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Condit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Condit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Condit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Condit. The network helps show where William C. Condit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside William C. Condit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William C. Condit Line = papers co-authored together William C. Condit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 197892
2 198089
3 198234
4 198131
5 197324
6 197520
7 197212
8 199111
9 19775
10 19835
11 19744
12 19764
13
Plasma confinement experiments in the TMX tandem mirror
19801
14 19851
15 19911

About William C. Condit

William C. Condit is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Aerospace Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (8 papers), Pulsed Power Technology Applications (5 papers), Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology (3 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (3 papers), Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (2 papers), Vacuum and Plasma Arcs (1 paper), Fusion and Plasma Physics Studies (1 paper) and Electric Motor Design and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (224 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (37 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (60 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (47 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (58 citations). William C. Condit has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include J.D. Hanson, J. A. Byers, B. I. Cohen, Donald G. Pellinen, S. Humphries, R. N. Sudan, L.M. Hively, J. W. Shearer, R. V. E. Lovelace and Kim Molvig. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Nuclear Fusion, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Computational Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact