Wilhelm Erber
Impact in
- Parasitology top 5%
- Vector-borne infectious diseases
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Viral Infections and Vectors
Papers in
- Parasitology 22
- Vector-borne infectious diseases 22
- Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies 1
-
- Mosquito-borne diseases and control 20
- Co-authors
- Heinz‐Josef Schmitt (7 shared papers)Andreas Pilz (4 shared papers)A. Rubinstein (1 shared paper)Kiron M. Das (1 shared paper)Dace Zavadska (7 shared papers)Luis Jódar (4 shared papers)Antra Bormane (3 shared papers)Guntis Karelis (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases (4 papers)Vaccine (2 papers)Clinical Microbiology and Infection (1 paper)Infection (1 paper)Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesLatviaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Wilhelm Erber
24 papers receiving 193 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Parasitology 162
- Infectious Diseases 133
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 137
- Insect Science 26
- Health 7
Countries citing papers authored by Wilhelm Erber
This map shows the geographic impact of Wilhelm Erber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wilhelm Erber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wilhelm Erber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wilhelm Erber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wilhelm Erber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wilhelm Erber. The network helps show where Wilhelm Erber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wilhelm Erber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 60 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 22 | |
| 4 | 1977 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1972 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 1 |
About Wilhelm Erber
Wilhelm Erber is a scholar working on Parasitology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Insect Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 204 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vector-borne infectious diseases (22 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (20 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (19 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers), Microscopic Colitis (1 paper), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (1 paper), Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies (1 paper) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (162 citations), Infectious Diseases (133 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (137 citations), Insect Science (26 citations) and Health (7 citations). Wilhelm Erber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Latvia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Heinz‐Josef Schmitt, Andreas Pilz, A. Rubinstein, Kiron M. Das, Dace Zavadska, Luis Jódar, Antra Bormane, Guntis Karelis, Gerhard Dobler and Farid Khan. Their work appears in journals such as Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, Vaccine, Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Infection and Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.