Whitney Phillips
Impact in
- Communication top 1%
- Social Media and Politics
- Media Studies and Communication
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
Papers in
-
- Crime, Deviance, and Social Control 2
- Digital Games and Media 1
-
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 2
- Literacy, Media, and Education 1
- Co-authors
- Ryan M. Milner (3 shared papers)Frances M. Russell (1 shared paper)Elisa Sarmiento (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Folklore Research (1 paper)Television & New Media (1 paper)Social Media + Society (1 paper)Journal of American Folklore (1 paper)The Ultrasound Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Whitney Phillips
13 papers receiving 930 citations
Whitney Phillips's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Communication 471
- Gender Studies 250
- Human-Computer Interaction 75
- Sociology and Political Science 539
- Artificial Intelligence 283
Countries citing papers authored by Whitney Phillips
This map shows the geographic impact of Whitney Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Whitney Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Whitney Phillips more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Whitney Phillips
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Whitney Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Whitney Phillips. The network helps show where Whitney Phillips may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Whitney Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 363 |
| 2 | The Ambivalent Internet: Mischief, Oddity, and Antagonism Online | 2017 | 199 |
| 3 | This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture | 2015 | 178 |
| 4 | 2011 | 116 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 60 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 40 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 1 |
About Whitney Phillips
Whitney Phillips is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Communication, Artificial Intelligence and Cultural Studies, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (2 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (2 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (2 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (1 paper), Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper) and Digital Games and Media (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (471 citations), Gender Studies (250 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (75 citations), Sociology and Political Science (539 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (283 citations). Whitney Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ryan M. Milner, Frances M. Russell and Elisa Sarmiento. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Folklore Research, Television & New Media, Social Media + Society, Journal of American Folklore and The Ultrasound Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.