WF Van Impe

405 citations
6 papers · 325 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

WF Van Impe

6 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

WF Van Impe
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 306
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 89
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 54
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 7
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 9
Replace Mark H. Wayne with:
Mark H. Wayne United States
S. R. Gandhi India
Anil Bhandari United States
Shailesh R. Gandhi India
R. Shivashankar India
Panpan Shen China
Fawzy M. Ezzein Canada
K Z Andrawes United Kingdom
Ding‐Bao Song Hong Kong
Jean-Pierre Giroud United States
WF Van Impe relative to Mark H. Wayne United States Mark H. Wayne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Mark H. Wayne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by WF Van Impe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of WF Van Impe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by WF Van Impe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites WF Van Impe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by WF Van Impe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by WF Van Impe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by WF Van Impe. The network helps show where WF Van Impe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside WF Van Impe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with WF Van Impe Line = papers co-authored together WF Van Impe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2002196
2 201592
3
Improvement of settlement behaviour of soft layers by means of stone columns
198327
4
Screw piling: still a challenging discussion topic?
20035
5
Densification of waste fills by dynamic compaction
19954
6
Impact of flocculants on the stress-strain behaviour of dredged sediments
20141

About WF Van Impe

WF Van Impe is a scholar working on Civil and Structural Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Surgery, Mechanics of Materials and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 6 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil and Unsaturated Flow (2 papers), Landfill Environmental Impact Studies (2 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization (2 papers), Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering (1 paper), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (1 paper), Geotechnical and construction materials studies (1 paper), Mining and Gasification Technologies (1 paper) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Civil and Structural Engineering (306 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (89 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (54 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (7 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (9 citations). WF Van Impe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include RD Holtz, Adam Bezuijen, Gemmina Di Emidio, Francesco Mazzieri, Ramiro Daniel Verástegui Flores and Evelina Fratalocchi. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Mechanics Reviews, Geosynthetics International, Medical Entomology and Zoology and Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact