W.E. Feero

497 citations
19 papers · 331 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

W.E. Feero

17 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

W.E. Feero
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Control and Systems Engineering 180
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 105
  • Geophysics 58
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 231
  • Biophysics 20
Replace B.L. Damsky with:
B.L. Damsky United States
Luis Martí Canada
L. Marti Canada
T. Kouno Japan
Zikri Abadi Baharudin Malaysia
M. Vitins Switzerland
T. Henriksen Norway
D. D. Wilson United States
C. Gary France
G. Galanos Greece
W.E. Feero relative to B.L. Damsky United States B.L. Damsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
B.L. Damsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W.E. Feero

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.E. Feero's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.E. Feero with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.E. Feero more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.E. Feero

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.E. Feero. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.E. Feero. The network helps show where W.E. Feero may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside W.E. Feero, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W.E. Feero Line = papers co-authored together W.E. Feero links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 196471
2 199661
3 200034
4 198724
5 198923
6 198621
7 198617
8 198916
9 199415
10 199711
11 196410
12 19828
13 19826
14 19714
15 19934
16 19713
17 20042
18
SAFETY OF HIGH SPEED GUIDED GROUND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: COMPARISON OF MAGNETIC AND ELECTRIC FIELDS OF CONVENTIONAL AND ADVANCED ELECTRIFIED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS
19931
19 19860

About W.E. Feero

W.E. Feero is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 19 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena (5 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (4 papers), Power Systems Fault Detection (4 papers), Smart Grid Security and Resilience (3 papers), High-Voltage Power Transmission Systems (3 papers), Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects (2 papers), Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation (2 papers) and Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Control and Systems Engineering (180 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (105 citations), Geophysics (58 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (231 citations) and Biophysics (20 citations). W.E. Feero has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include W.B. Gish, G.D. Rockefeller, C. L. Wagner, R. Albrecht, B.L. Damsky, Tom Molinski, H. E. Petschek, Robert H. Jones, John H. Dunlap and P.G. McLaren. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Eos, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal and IEEE Power Engineering Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact