W.E. China
Impact in
-
- Hemiptera Insect Studies
- Fossil Insects in Amber
- Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies
- Insect Science top 10%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Research on scale insects
Papers in
-
- Hemiptera Insect Studies 20
- Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies 5
-
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 14
- Research on scale insects 7
- Co-authors
- Margaret Doyle (4 shared papers)R. G. Fennah (1 shared paper)N. C. E. Miller (3 shared papers)James A. Slater (1 shared paper)S. McGill (1 shared paper)Richard D. Stevens (1 shared paper)Michael Ashburner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Bulletin of Entomological Research (2 papers)Pacific Science (1 paper)Nucleic Acids Research (1 paper)Mammalia (1 paper)The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomPortugalNorway
In The Last Decade
W.E. China
33 papers receiving 170 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 155
- Insect Science 93
- Paleontology 16
- Plant Science 49
- Genetics 34
Countries citing papers authored by W.E. China
This map shows the geographic impact of W.E. China's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.E. China with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.E. China more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W.E. China
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.E. China. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.E. China. The network helps show where W.E. China may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside W.E. China, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1962 | 40 | |
| 2 | 1957 | 20 | |
| 3 | 1952 | 13 | |
| 4 | 1955 | 12 | |
| 5 | Official list of generic names in zoology | 1966 | 11 |
| 6 | 1953 | 9 | |
| 7 | 1955 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1951 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1959 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1956 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1951 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1955 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1956 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1960 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1951 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1952 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1962 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1963 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1962 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1952 | 3 |
About W.E. China
W.E. China is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Ecology, Plant Science and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 35 papers that have together received 189 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hemiptera Insect Studies (20 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (14 papers), Research on scale insects (7 papers), Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (6 papers), Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies (5 papers), Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones (4 papers), Ecology and biodiversity studies (4 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (155 citations), Insect Science (93 citations), Paleontology (16 citations), Plant Science (49 citations) and Genetics (34 citations). W.E. China has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Doyle, R. G. Fennah, N. C. E. Miller, James A. Slater, S. McGill, Richard D. Stevens and Michael Ashburner. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of Entomological Research, Pacific Science, Nucleic Acids Research, Mammalia and The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.