Warwick Williams

88 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Warwick Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Sensory Systems 431
  • Speech and Hearing 466
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 410
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 50
  • Ecological Modeling 41
Replace Paul T. Sowden with:
Paul T. Sowden United Kingdom
Robert M. Abrams United States
Jair Mendes Marques Brazil
R. Hinchcliffe United Kingdom
Christa L. Themann United States
Alf Axelsson Sweden
Adrián Fuente Canada
Rickie R. Davis United States
Erik Borg Sweden
Frederick J. Gallun United States
Warwick Williams relative to Paul T. Sowden United Kingdom Paul T. Sowden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.7×
Paul T. Sowden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Warwick Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Warwick Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Warwick Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Warwick Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Warwick Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Warwick Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Warwick Williams. The network helps show where Warwick Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Warwick Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Warwick Williams Line = papers co-authored together Warwick Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014112
2 198096
3 200582
4 201458
5 201255
6 201055
7 201353
8
Epidemiology of noise-induced hearing loss in New Zealand.
200849
9 198441
10 200536
11 201226
12 201124
13 201324
14 200723
15 201222
16 201922
17 201521
18 200918
19 200618
20 201518

About Warwick Williams

Warwick Williams is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 89 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Noise Effects and Management (45 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (22 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (21 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (5 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (3 papers), Agriculture and Farm Safety (3 papers) and Effects of Vibration on Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (431 citations), Speech and Hearing (466 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (410 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (50 citations) and Ecological Modeling (41 citations). Warwick Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Megan Gilliver, Elizabeth Francis Beach, Lyndal Carter, Suzanne C. Purdy, Peter J. S. Fleming, Guy Ballard, Michael Schaefer, Paul D. Meek, Greg Falzon and Anita Bundy. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Audiology, Noise and Health, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, The Medical Journal of Australia and Ear and Hearing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact