Wanda Olech
Impact in
- Small Animals top 2%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Ecology top 5%
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Ecology and biodiversity studies
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Kajetan Perzanowski (13 shared papers)Daniel Klich (29 shared papers)Rafał Łopucki (9 shared papers)Zbigniew A. Krasiński (1 shared paper)Zdzisław Pucek (2 shared papers)Małgorzata Krasińska (1 shared paper)Krzysztof Anusz (21 shared papers)Konrad Dąbrowski (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Animals (9 papers)Diversity (9 papers)BMC Veterinary Research (4 papers)Scientific Reports (4 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- PolandUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Wanda Olech
96 papers receiving 900 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Small Animals 154
- Ecology 357
- Ecological Modeling 53
- Aquatic Science 77
- Physiology 46
Countries citing papers authored by Wanda Olech
This map shows the geographic impact of Wanda Olech's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wanda Olech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wanda Olech more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wanda Olech
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wanda Olech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wanda Olech. The network helps show where Wanda Olech may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wanda Olech, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 106 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | European Bison: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan | 2003 | 94 |
| 2 | 2005 | 69 | |
| 3 | 1987 | 50 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 8 | Analysis of Inbreeding in European Bison | 1987 | 26 |
| 9 | 1999 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 15 |
About Wanda Olech
Wanda Olech is a scholar working on Genetics, Ecology, Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 106 papers that have together received 962 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (23 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (23 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (11 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (8 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (7 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (7 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (7 papers) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (154 citations), Ecology (357 citations), Ecological Modeling (53 citations), Aquatic Science (77 citations) and Physiology (46 citations). Wanda Olech has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kajetan Perzanowski, Daniel Klich, Rafał Łopucki, Zbigniew A. Krasiński, Zdzisław Pucek, Małgorzata Krasińska, Krzysztof Anusz, Konrad Dąbrowski, Teresa Ostaszewska and Michał K. Krzysiak. Their work appears in journals such as Animals, Diversity, BMC Veterinary Research, Scientific Reports and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.