W. Schauer

839 citations
39 papers · 625 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

W. Schauer

37 papers receiving 570 citations

Peers

W. Schauer
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Condensed Matter Physics 552
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 217
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 174
  • Biomedical Engineering 232
  • Aerospace Engineering 69
Replace K. Shibutani with:
K. Shibutani Japan
Katsuzo Aihara Japan
P. S. Swartz United States
M. Umeda Japan
W. A. Fietz United States
A. Pollini Switzerland
A. Perin Switzerland
R. Fl�kiger Switzerland
F. Wellhöfer United Kingdom
E. Seibt Germany
W. Schauer relative to K. Shibutani Japan K. Shibutani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
K. Shibutani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Schauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Schauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Schauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Schauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Schauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Schauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Schauer. The network helps show where W. Schauer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Schauer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Schauer Line = papers co-authored together W. Schauer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998130
2 198785
3 198765
4 198164
5 198836
6 199136
7 198024
8 199422
9 199014
10 198813
11 198312
12 197612
13 198712
14 199812
15 19819
16 19817
17 19837
18 19856
19 19936
20 19925

About W. Schauer

W. Schauer is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 39 papers that have together received 625 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (26 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (14 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (12 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (9 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (8 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (6 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (4 papers) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (552 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (217 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (174 citations), Biomedical Engineering (232 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (69 citations). W. Schauer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Japan. Frequent co-authors include R. Meier-Hirmer, I. Apfelstedt, H. Wühl, H. W�hl, R. Fl�kiger, H. Küpfer, Th. Wolf, А. Zhukov, B. Krevet and F. Wüchner. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Physica C Superconductivity, Cryogenics, The European Physical Journal B and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact