W Grant

1.1k citations
29 papers · 336 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Medieval Literature and History 5
    • Byzantine Studies and History 3
    • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 4

W Grant

20 papers receiving 172 citations

Peers

W Grant
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Classics 68
  • History and Philosophy of Science 82
  • Anthropology 105
  • Philosophy 107
  • History 65
Replace Letizia Panizza with:
Letizia Panizza United Kingdom
Pearl Kibre United States
John E. Weakland United States
Tullio Gregory Italy
David Luscombe United Kingdom
Mary A. Rouse United States
Paola Zambelli Italy
Fernand Van Steenberghen
Bonner Mitchell United States
Jean Jolivet France
W Grant relative to Letizia Panizza United Kingdom Letizia Panizza's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Letizia Panizza · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W Grant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W Grant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W Grant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W Grant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W Grant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W Grant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W Grant. The network helps show where W Grant may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside W Grant, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W Grant Line = papers co-authored together W Grant links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1961118
2 195660
3 200430
4 196224
5 197622
6 196616
7 196515
8 199011
9 19658
10 19927
11 19546
12 19944
13
Ontario High School History of Canada
20162
14 19642
15 19511
16 19591
17 19881
18 19631
19
South African uranium enrichment project
19751
20 19511

About W Grant

W Grant is a scholar working on Classics, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Language and Linguistics and History, having authored 29 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (5 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (4 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (4 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (3 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (3 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (3 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (2 papers) and Medieval European Literature and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (68 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (82 citations), Anthropology (105 citations), Philosophy (107 citations) and History (65 citations). W Grant has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include B. L. Ullman, Constantinos Sioutas, Jeffrey L. Ambs, Peter A. Jaques, Frederic G. Cassidy, John Wattis, Stephen Harris, Deno J. Geanakoplos, Roger Paxton and Alwyn Cohall. Their work appears in journals such as Phoenix, Medicine Science and the Law, American Speech, Harvard Theological Review and Comparative Literature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact