W. Glänzel
Impact in
-
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
-
- Academic Publishing and Open Access
Papers in
-
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research 8
-
- International Science and Diplomacy 2
- Co-authors
- A. Schubert (13 shared papers)T. Braun (9 shared papers)T. Braun (4 shared papers)G. G. Hamedani (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Scientometrics (11 papers)TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry (3 papers)Czechoslovak Journal of Physics (1 paper)Studia Scientiarum Mathematicarum Hungarica (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- HungaryUnited States
In The Last Decade
W. Glänzel
16 papers receiving 355 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 276
- Information Systems and Management 39
- History and Philosophy of Science 16
- Information Systems 75
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 38
Countries citing papers authored by W. Glänzel
This map shows the geographic impact of W. Glänzel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Glänzel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Glänzel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. Glänzel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Glänzel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Glänzel. The network helps show where W. Glänzel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside W. Glänzel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 84 | |
| 2 | 1983 | 75 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 37 | |
| 4 | 1989 | 34 | |
| 5 | 1989 | 26 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 23 | |
| 7 | 1986 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1987 | 17 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 15 | |
| 11 | 1987 | 15 | |
| 12 | 1989 | 12 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1990 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 3 |
About W. Glänzel
W. Glänzel is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Political Science and International Relations, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Information Systems and Finance, having authored 16 papers that have together received 396 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (8 papers), History and advancements in chemistry (2 papers), International Science and Diplomacy (2 papers), Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies (1 paper), Academic Publishing and Open Access (1 paper), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (1 paper), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (1 paper) and Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (276 citations), Information Systems and Management (39 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (16 citations), Information Systems (75 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (38 citations). W. Glänzel has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary and United States. Frequent co-authors include A. Schubert, T. Braun, T. Braun and G. G. Hamedani. Their work appears in journals such as Scientometrics, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, Czechoslovak Journal of Physics and Studia Scientiarum Mathematicarum Hungarica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.