W. E. Sleat

999 citations
42 papers · 804 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

W. E. Sleat

38 papers receiving 723 citations

Peers

W. E. Sleat
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Instrumentation 74
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 637
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 548
  • Biophysics 33
  • Structural Biology 8
Replace Patrick O’Shea with:
Patrick O’Shea United States
Wolfgang Rudolph Germany
S. Aoshima Japan
Mikhail Y. Schelev Russia
Dean Liu China
William Randall Babbitt United States
Houkun Liang China
Kazunori Naganuma Japan
Anatoly V. Efimov United States
E. A. Stappaerts United States
W. E. Sleat relative to Patrick O’Shea United States Patrick O’Shea's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Patrick O’Shea · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. E. Sleat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. E. Sleat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. E. Sleat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. E. Sleat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. E. Sleat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. E. Sleat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. E. Sleat. The network helps show where W. E. Sleat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. E. Sleat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. E. Sleat Line = papers co-authored together W. E. Sleat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971130
2 1997100
3 199188
4 198059
5 199440
6 197138
7 199238
8 197236
9 198134
10 198829
11 199728
12 199325
13 198223
14 199319
15 199014
16 198911
17 199510
18 19729
19 19898
20 19868

About W. E. Sleat

W. E. Sleat is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Media Technology and Radiation, having authored 42 papers that have together received 804 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (22 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (17 papers), Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (11 papers), Laser Design and Applications (11 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (11 papers), Photocathodes and Microchannel Plates (5 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (4 papers) and Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (74 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (637 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (548 citations), Biophysics (33 citations) and Structural Biology (8 citations). W. E. Sleat has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and China. Frequent co-authors include W. Sibbett, Daniel Joseph Bradley, David E. Spence, Derryck T. Reid, Miles J. Padgett, Adrian A. Finch, D. R. Walker, Alan G Roddie, John M. Dudley and Kara Diane Lamb. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Communications, Optics Letters, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, Applied Physics Letters and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact