W. E. Howell

671 citations
60 papers · 455 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Plant Virus Research Studies 17
    • Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 8
    • Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies 6
    • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock 9

W. E. Howell

52 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers

W. E. Howell
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Horticulture 23
  • Endocrinology 102
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 78
  • Plant Science 239
  • Genetics 37
Replace Daiki Matsuda with:
Daiki Matsuda United States
Egon Fuchs Germany
Romain Grangeon Canada
H. Abe Japan
João Paulo Machado Brazil
Tomoko Mihara Japan
Hiroyuki Mizumoto Japan
Edward J. Cargill United States
Xiaoping Guo China
W. E. Howell relative to Daiki Matsuda United States Daiki Matsuda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Daiki Matsuda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. E. Howell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. E. Howell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. E. Howell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. E. Howell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. E. Howell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. E. Howell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. E. Howell. The network helps show where W. E. Howell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. E. Howell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. E. Howell Line = papers co-authored together W. E. Howell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Spinal dysraphism, arthrogryposis and cleft palate in newborn charolais calves.
196932
2 197030
3 198727
4 199724
5 200122
6 198721
7 200120
8 198019
9 198318
10 198818
11 198415
12 200115
13 199913
14 199712
15 199811
16 199810
17 20069
18 19819
19 19667
20 19987

About W. E. Howell

W. E. Howell is a scholar working on Plant Science, Genetics, Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology and Endocrinology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Virus Research Studies (17 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (9 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (8 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (7 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (6 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (6 papers), Fungal Plant Pathogen Control (5 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (23 citations), Endocrinology (102 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (78 citations), Plant Science (239 citations) and Genetics (37 citations). W. E. Howell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include G. I. Mink, H. W. Leipold, W.F. Cates, O. M. Radostits, D. James, I.A. Jeffcoate, N. C. Rawlings, Kenneth C. Eastwell, R.J. Mapletoft and G. A. Lang. Their work appears in journals such as Plant Disease, Canadian Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Animal Science, Theriogenology and Australian Veterinary Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact