W. E. Crum

892 citations
8 papers · 47 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Archeology top 10%
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
    • Ancient Egypt and Archaeology

Papers in

    • Archaeology and Historical Studies 6
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 4
    • Ancient Egypt and Archaeology 2
    • Ancient Near East History 1
    • Historical and Linguistic Studies 5
Journals
Medical Entomology and Zoology (5 papers)

In The Last Decade

W. E. Crum

5 papers receiving 26 citations

Peers

W. E. Crum
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
  • Religious studies 19
  • Archeology 33
  • Anthropology 11
  • Classics 4
  • History 6
Replace Anton Baumstark with:
Anton Baumstark
Françoise Briquel-Chatonnet Germany
Paul McKechnie New Zealand
N. R. M. de Lange United Kingdom
Colin J. Hemer
Leah Di Segni Israel
Kim Haines‐Eitzen United States
Oskar Skarsaune
Katell Berthelot France
Wilhelm Bousset
W. E. Crum relative to Anton Baumstark Anton Baumstark's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Anton Baumstark · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. E. Crum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. E. Crum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. E. Crum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. E. Crum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. E. Crum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. E. Crum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. E. Crum. The network helps show where W. E. Crum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside W. E. Crum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. E. Crum Line = papers co-authored together W. E. Crum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
Catalogue of the Coptic Manuscripts in the British Museum
201815
2
Sinuthii archimandritae vita et opera omnia
195211
3
Jews and Christians in Egypt;: The Jewish troubles in Alexandria and the Athanasian controversy
197210
4
The Canons of Athanasius of Alexandria: The Arabic and Coptic Versions
20096
5
Greek Papyri in the British Museum
20104
6
Compléments au Dictionnaire copte de Crum
19641
7
Theological texts from Coptic papyri
20190
8
The Amherst Papyri: Being an account of the Egyptian papyri in the collection of the Right Hon. Lord Amherst of Hackney, F.S.A. at Didlington Hall, Norfolk
20170

About W. E. Crum

W. E. Crum is a scholar working on Archeology, Sociology and Political Science, Language and Linguistics, Religious studies and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 47 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and Historical Studies (6 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (5 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (2 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (1 paper), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper), Ancient Near East History (1 paper) and Linguistics and language evolution (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (19 citations), Archeology (33 citations), Anthropology (11 citations), Classics (4 citations) and History (6 citations). Frequent co-authors include Frederic G. Kenyon and Percy E. Newberry. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact