W. Crewe

37 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers

W. Crewe
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Linguistics and Language 82
  • Parasitology 81
  • Language and Linguistics 130
  • Literature and Literary Theory 95
  • Insect Science 73
Replace Sununguko Wata Mpoloka with:
Sununguko Wata Mpoloka Botswana
Cristina González Argentina
Bradley J. Tucker United States
Jon Solomon United States
Thelma D. Sullivan United States
C. S. Richards South Africa
Tuomas Aivelo Finland
Robert M. Zingg Switzerland
Marion Kirchner Germany
Noémie S. Becker Germany
W. Crewe relative to Sununguko Wata Mpoloka Botswana Sununguko Wata Mpoloka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×47.5×
Sununguko Wata Mpoloka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Crewe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Crewe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Crewe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Crewe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Crewe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Crewe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Crewe. The network helps show where W. Crewe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside W. Crewe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Crewe Line = papers co-authored together W. Crewe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990100
2
The English language in Singapore
197786
3 200335
4 195333
5 195124
6 195619
7 195113
8 197113
9 196112
10 195412
11 196111
12 195311
13 195410
14
Possible transmission of bovine cysticercosis by gulls.
196910
15
The tabanid fauna of streams at Kumba, British Cameroons.
19559
16
Hongkong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 12.
19899
17 19999
18 19639
19 19638
20 19568

About W. Crewe

W. Crewe is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Ecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 42 papers that have together received 504 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mosquito-borne diseases and control (5 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (4 papers), Insects and Parasite Interactions (3 papers), Entomological Studies and Ecology (3 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (3 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (3 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (3 papers) and Parasitic infections in humans and animals (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (82 citations), Parasitology (81 citations), Language and Linguistics (130 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (95 citations) and Insect Science (73 citations). W. Crewe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include R. M. Gordon, R. W. Ashford, W. N. Beesley, Fintan O’Rourke, Paul Williams, David H. Smith, W. E. Kershaw, Michael A. Barger, H. Vogel and H. Oldroyd. Their work appears in journals such as RELC Journal, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, ELT Journal, Veterinary Parasitology and Parasitology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact