Veerle Rots
Impact in
- Archeology top 0.2%
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
- Archaeological and Geological Studies
- Paleontology top 0.5%
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Papers in
- Anthropology 70
- Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology 66
- Paleontology 64
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies 60
- Co-authors
- Philip Van Peer (9 shared papers)Hugues Plisson (2 shared papers)Dries Cnuts (21 shared papers)Pierre Vermeersch (10 shared papers)Nicholas J. Conard (11 shared papers)Elspeth Hayes (5 shared papers)Jordi Serangeli (3 shared papers)Guillaume Porraz (5 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Veerle Rots
104 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Archeology 365
- Paleontology 1.8k
- Anthropology 2.0k
- Archeology 1.3k
- Geography, Planning and Development 94
Countries citing papers authored by Veerle Rots
This map shows the geographic impact of Veerle Rots's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Veerle Rots with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veerle Rots more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Veerle Rots
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Veerle Rots. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Veerle Rots. The network helps show where Veerle Rots may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Veerle Rots, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 108 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 171 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 162 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 119 | |
| 4 | Prehension and Hafting Traces on Flint Tools: A Methodology | 2010 | 115 |
| 5 | 2012 | 112 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 109 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 92 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 86 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 83 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 81 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 75 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 72 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 72 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 68 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 47 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 47 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 43 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 39 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 39 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 37 |
About Veerle Rots
Veerle Rots is a scholar working on Anthropology, Paleontology, Archeology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Archeology, having authored 108 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (66 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (60 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (33 papers), Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction (11 papers), Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (10 papers), Archaeology and Rock Art Studies (9 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (9 papers) and Archaeological and Geological Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (365 citations), Paleontology (1.8k citations), Anthropology (2.0k citations), Archeology (1.3k citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (94 citations). Veerle Rots has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Philip Van Peer, Hugues Plisson, Dries Cnuts, Pierre Vermeersch, Nicholas J. Conard, Elspeth Hayes, Jordi Serangeli, Guillaume Porraz, Viola Schmid and Carol Lentfer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Archaeological Science Reports, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, Journal of Archaeological Science, PLoS ONE and Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.