Vanessa Thomas

485 citations
21 papers · 325 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Vanessa Thomas

20 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers

Vanessa Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Human-Computer Interaction 159
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 100
  • Media Technology 74
  • Transportation 40
  • Computer Science Applications 23
Replace Sarah-Kristin Thiel with:
Sarah-Kristin Thiel Austria
Henrik Korsgaard Denmark
Nina Valkanova Spain
Martin Brynskov Denmark
Lara Houston United Kingdom
Janet Davis United States
Eric Corbett United States
Rikke Hagensby Jensen Denmark
María Menéndez-Blanco Italy
Martín Tironi Chile
Vanessa Thomas relative to Sarah-Kristin Thiel Austria Sarah-Kristin Thiel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sarah-Kristin Thiel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Vanessa Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vanessa Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vanessa Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vanessa Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vanessa Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vanessa Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vanessa Thomas. The network helps show where Vanessa Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Vanessa Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Vanessa Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Vanessa Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201656
2 201743
3 201842
4 201727
5 201726
6 201821
7 201720
8 201019
9 201516
10 202116
11 20189
12 20178
13 20186
14 20234
15 20154
16 20184
17
Taming a Run-Away Object:How to Maintain and Extend Human Control in Human-Computer Interaction?
20181
18 20181
19 20181
20 20181

About Vanessa Thomas

Vanessa Thomas is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Management of Technology and Innovation, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Media Technology and Information Systems, having authored 21 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (12 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (10 papers), Green IT and Sustainability (6 papers), Smart Cities and Technologies (4 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (2 papers), Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (1 paper), Color perception and design (1 paper) and Face Recognition and Perception (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (159 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (100 citations), Media Technology (74 citations), Transportation (40 citations) and Computer Science Applications (23 citations). Vanessa Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Christian Remy, Oliver Bates, Mike Hazas, Nick Dunn, Ding Wang, Elaine M. Huang, Adrian Friday, Alan Dix, Dietmar Kennepohl and Lisa P. Nathan. Their work appears in journals such as interactions, Sustainability, Geoforum, Developmental Science and The Design Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact